Showing posts with label adopt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label adopt. Show all posts
Thursday, 7 February 2013
Speeding up hyperlinks: topics
In a conversation with Jon Husband earlier today, we discussed hyperlinks - and how they've changed this world. In my view, hyperlinks form zero-threshold access to any and all information just a single click away. Whenever I scavenge the Web for info, I open up links in new tabs until there are 20 or so of them, and then scan the results, greatly helped by search, maybe jumping back and forth or drilling down deeper and deeper.
Compare that with the old fashioned way I had to gather information, which at best resulted in a day or so in one or more libraries where some or most books would be out on loan and I'd only have the full result set after a week or two, sometimes more - leaving me with a metre of paper books I had to plow through
Scanning them was simple yet elaborate: read the index, pick the most appetising chapters, and from each of those carefully read the first and last paragraph. Mark in mind or on paper if worthwhile, and continue search - I used to write 10-page papers in a single night doing so
Now, we have hyperlinks - and I still miss something. I call it topics, and here is how I envision them to work
Tuesday, 16 October 2012
I'm sorry, you're just not incompetent enough to get it
Olivier Blanchard made me do it.
And it is. Definition of advancement? Coming up soon. But this is the driver for most, if not all, of your life: work, life, religion, politics, social media (sic) and last but certainly not least successful Enterprise products.@martijnlinssen :D As far as I can tell, incompetence isn't a driver of failure. It's a driver of advancement.
— Olivier Blanchard (@thebrandbuilder) October 16, 2012
Come again? Yes
Monday, 10 September 2012
GoDaddy... Go... Gone
Tonight the Godaddy servers have been hit by a simple DDOS - a distributed denial of service involving a few dozen clients or servers that fire off hundreds or even thousands of requests a second at their servers. It's a simple attack, and very effective. It's like Arnold Schwarzenegger in Kindergarten Cop, standing in the middle of the classroom and getting all those toddler questions fired off at him. The inevitable result: he breaks down
Tuesday, 31 July 2012
Google you are so sad, you drive me mad
Google has tried a new trick to lure in people to their destined-to-die Social Network, aka Google+
Update August 3 7:32 GMT+2:
This works on Internet Explorer 8. I haven't been able to reproduce this on other browsers and versions
Why the harsh words? Because I'm appalled by the method they choose. If you're not getting enough attention for your product or service, you should try to make it more attractive (financially, operationally, which ever way) - not invent cunning ways to whip people towards or into it
What has Google tried now? They limit your Google Search results to 20, unless you sign up for Google+.
Let me repeat that: Google limits your Google Search results (to 20), unless you sign up for Google+
Labels:
1.0,
adopt,
change,
management,
maturity,
Social Business Design,
social media,
trust
0
reacties
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Will adopting social tools leverage adaptation?
After a week of hiking in Ireland (hence the picture), it's hard to pick up blogging again. Thankfully, Michael Brito got me going and an interesting conversation, with an old theme, unfolded:
RT @martijnlinssen: @Britopian I think the need to adapt rather than adopt is what stalls #socbiz. Takes a few times longer than usual
— Michael Brito (@Britopian) June 19, 2012
Michael, Olivier and I took it a bit further and ended up with indeed the ancient argument:
@adamsinger @thebrandbuilder @MartijnLinssen that brings up the ancient argument .. can you teach certain characteristics like leadership
— Michael Brito (@Britopian) June 19, 2012
My answer? Yes and no - let me explain please
Monday, 23 April 2012
Why management rocks, and leadership sucks
[Image by _MG_5503]
The past 24 hours I had a fierce conversation on leadership and management, and I love how just everyone joined in on Twitter; especially those that disagree with me because they teach me most in the shortest amount of time
I started it with
Every one wants to be a leader, but no one wants to be led #leadershipBy the way, that picture of the Redskins cheerleaders is just there to spice up my blog and the post. Might lead your eyes astray for a moment, but no pun intended. I had a very hard time to select photographs that weren't shot at some battlefield or military institution, seems like the US army keeps their men happy that way. Now that is what I call management par example...
- Martijn Linssen (@MartijnLinssen) April 22, 2012
Labels:
1.0,
3.0,
adapt,
adopt,
business exceptions,
business rules,
change,
growth,
management,
maturity,
Social Business Design,
trust
0
reacties
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
Why API's suck, and what they lack
The Social Media Movement is slowly moving towards monetisation. Social Business, yes even Social Enterprise, is nigh.
Infographics bite the dust in an ever-increasing frenzy to prove that social is here to stay, to rule, to conquer the world!
And as yet another evidence of that, API's are brought forward - by the hundreds, no the thousands - to prove that the Brave New Open World has finally (yeah, really finally this time, right?) come
Well, I don't think so. API's suck - big time
Wednesday, 7 March 2012
The benefits and concerns of Social
This post is the last in a series of six that deals with Social Business and Social Enterprise. The goal of the series: to explore the pros and cons of Social Business and Social Enterprise, given the current odds, and fast-forwarding to business opportunities now and in the near future
Well, this is it.
1. A small recap
Friday, 2 March 2012
The concerns of Social Enterprise
This post is the fifth in a series of six that deals with Social Business and Social Enterprise. The goal of the series: to explore the pros and cons of Social Business and Social Enterprise, given the current odds, and fast-forwarding to business opportunities now and in the near future
This post is about the concerns of Social Enterprise. While yesterday's was all about the concerns of Social Business, this one will take those concerns and apply them to Social Enterprise. An enterprise is a company with 10,000 employees or more, regardless of geographical dispersal (my definition)
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
The concerns of Social Business
[Image by Diego Cupolo]
This post is the fourth in a series of six that deals with Social Business and Social Enterprise. The goal of the series: to explore the pros and cons of Social Business and Social Enterprise, given the current odds, and fast-forwarding to business opportunities now and in the near future
This post is about the concerns of Social Business. While yesterday's was all about the benefits of Social Enterprise, this one will take concerns and apply them to Social Business
Tuesday, 28 February 2012
The benefits of Social Enterprise
This post is the third in a series of six that deals with Social Business and Social Enterprise. The goal of the series: to explore the pros and cons of Social Business and Social Enterprise, given the current odds, and fast-forwarding to business opportunities now and in the near future
This post is about the benefits of Social Enterprise. While yesterday's was all about the benefits of Social Business, this one will take those benefits and apply them to the Enterprise. An enterprise is a company with 10,000 employees or more, regardless of geographical dispersal (my definition)
So let's take all the Social we can imagine, and throw that to the current enterprise, and see where the benefits are. By the way, the drawing above is my favourite from Hugh MacLeod, and I got one in my office
The benefits of Social Business 2/2
This post is the second in a series of six that deals with Social Business and Social Enterprise. The goal of the series: to explore the pros and cons of Social Business and Social Enterprise, given the current odds, and fast-forwarding to business opportunities now and in the near future
This post is about the benefits of Social Business, part two of two. While yesterday's was all about the history of Business, this one will fill in the gaps left by it - it will deal with the present and the future
Monday, 27 February 2012
The benefits of Social Business 1/2
This post is the first in a series of six that deals with Social Business and Social Enterprise. The goal of the series: to explore the pros and cons of Social Business and Social Enterprise, given the current odds, and fast-forwarding to business opportunities now and in the near future
This post is about the benefits of Social Business, part one of two. It will relate the history of Business, and I'm sorry but that does take up an entire blog post - ask Socrates.
The definition of Social Business is this:
Social Business deals with business exceptions rather than rules, requiring flexible answers to complex questions in dynamic environments. As such, it isn't about giving predefined answers to predictable questions, it is about giving unpredictable answers to undefined questions.
Social Business serves best where an increased distance between people on all sides is negatively affecting business as a whole.
Social Business is best for establishing ties between unknown people.
As such, it will gradually replace distance by proximity, thus swapping anonymity for intimacy
Tuesday, 17 January 2012
The evangalyst: preaching to the converted
There are definite signs of evolution in social media. Where I saw some issues around mainstream adoption over a year ago, I can now rest assured.
Dozens of "priests and monks" have arisen all over the world to further aid the conversion towards social; Social Business now is the way to go and according to most InfoGraphics over 3/4 of all businesses all over the globe have either implemented social media or are very happy with it, or both
Labels:
1.0,
adopt,
B2B,
change,
data quality,
marketing,
Social Business Design,
social media,
trust,
Twitter
0
reacties
Wednesday, 28 December 2011
Ticking the TOS box means you Agree
There has been some fuss about Google+ deleting someone's profile picture as it showed him giving the middle finger, aka flipping the bird.
Google deleted the profile picture, without notice.
Apparently Mr. Siegler doesn't like G+ doing so, as he can have the same profile picture on Twitter "and other services", as he claims. What does that have to with the price of tea in China?
Mr. Siegler then continues to whine about Google's real naming policy, as if that has anything to do with it either
Thursday, 22 December 2011
The Law of the Handicap of a Headstart
In discussions about SAP's new stealth weapon, HANA, I have come to become a wee weary. At SAP Inside Track NL we joked about it:
@jonerp @dahowlett @ragtag @applebyj like we said at #sitNL "When lost for words, just end your sentence with HANA and you'll be fine"
What is HANA? In short, it uses SSD storage combined with a lot of in-memory to speed up results. SAP's claim is 3600 times faster results achieved with SAP HANA 1.0 with one 4-way, 8 core server (2.27 GHz clock speed) with 0.5 TB of Main Memory, 2 TB of SSD storage, 1Gb Ethernet running on an open source operating system.
Wednesday, 30 November 2011
Integration is the new Operation - this decade and next
I gave a presentation the other day that is a very short version of my Integration book. As usual, that forced me to compact thoughts and ideas, and craft a new visual - see above.
I've used that already in a post the other day, but that didn't pay proper attention to it
I'm a bit tired of all the use of the word integrated and integration over the last few weeks and months. I would like to say: "You keep using that word. I think it does not mean what you think it means"
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
Social silos adding to enterprise silos? Not with proper Integration
Laurie Buzcek called out for Integration as a solution for the failure of Enterprise 2.0 and Social Business - which she equates to each other - and I couldn't help but think of Tibbr when reading her post
Dion Hinchcliffe responded with a post in which he also stresses the integration of social media with enterprise tools, albeit he's careful to stress that pure technology can't be the answer - apparently we're really beyond E2.0 now
Dion claims OpenSocial 2.0 is the answer but I fail to see how that will help us further: although an impressive amount of work, it is purely technical and relying on the fact that
Developers can create applications, using standard JavaScript and HTML, that run on social websites that have implemented the OpenSocial APIs
and I don't see that happen any time soon - the only successful 2.0 Social Tools are those that are 1.0 in nature: confined
Labels:
3.0,
A2A,
adapt,
adopt,
application development,
B2B,
B2C,
business exceptions,
business rules,
data quality,
E2E,
EAI,
EDI,
ESB,
growth,
Integration,
messaging,
social media,
standardisation
0
reacties
Thursday, 30 June 2011
1.0, 2.0, 3.0 - Tibbr shows the way
For those who are familiar with me and my posts, you'll know that I'm passionate about Integration. My Integration eBook, my posts - even though I cover a wide range of topics - all are about diversity, evolutionary growth and change, while standing with both feet on the ground and keeping a pragmatic view
I love social - wrote an eBook about that too and ended with a balanced conclusion. I don't like 1.0, nor the 1.0 I encounter in this 2.0 world - search my blog for evangelist or Klout and you'll get my idea
I got a lot of reactions to yesterday's post on tibbr 3.0 - a good lot of people still don't get my idea, so let me explain why I think Tibco's tibbr is redefining the enterprise business model
Saturday, 11 June 2011
Problem prevention knows no funding
A major topic on Twitter for me this week was that of problem prevention.
We all know error handling, error solving, creating workarounds or solutions for them, but "A stitch in time saves nine" is a debatable issue in ICT
Or is it?
It all started with a tweet from Jamie Oswald:
IT's biggest problem is its realization that there is more money in managing one's problems than in fixing them. #grrrrr
to which I responded:
@oswaldxxl also, hard to get budget for preventing problems from occurring
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






_75.jpg)












